3 ms·
Exactly what I think. This is the kind of code that doesn't have a platonic ideal, it has to get updated with time and experience and reports. There is no "non-
by OskarS 5y ago
Exactly what I think. This is the kind of code that doesn't have a platonic ideal, it has to get updated with time and experience and reports. There is no "non-hacky" way to do this, you just have to look at the reports that are coming in and keep adding rules that are relevant.
- tonfreed 5y agoYou say that there's no "non-hacky" way, but... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ5ppf0po3k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ5ppf0po3k He made a filter that did analysis of the pronunciation of the messages that were being sent. His breakdown of it starts at around 13:30
- ridaj 5y agoWell there are some significantly less hacky / more scalable ways to do this. This looks at the edge of maintainability, but if the lists were 10x as long and people constantly stepped on each other's toes causing outages while making updates, a bit of project investment probably wouldn't be a bad idea.