> So what happens in a year or two if, however unlikely it may seem now, bad medium-to-long term effects of the vaccines start to show up? I am not going to sa

> So what happens in a year or two if, however unlikely it may seem now, bad medium-to-long term effects of the vaccines start to show up? I am not going to say that's impossible. I am going to suggest that there would be Nobel prize in medicine waiting for the people who can explain the novel mechanism for _how_ those supposed much delayed side effects are possible. Vaccine side effects occur shortly afterwards (1). They do not surface a year later - and it would have to be a year later, not 6 months, given when mass vaccination programs started & what we haven't seen happen in the real world. And vaccine side effect also do not surface 6 months later, FWIW. Why do you feel invested in fantasising about "vindication, propaganda, cover-up". Is this heathy? You're nearly there with "could not ever afford to admit being wrong" 1) "In virtually all cases, vaccine side effects are seen within the first two months after rollout." https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item/12143-three-things-to-know-about-the-long-term-side-effects-of-covid-vaccines https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item/12143-three-things-to-k...