3 ms·
I'd argue $100/hr isn't enough for that work, but sounds about right from what I've seen. Whereas I've done a java, scala, kafka, spark, postgres job and easil
by phibz 5y ago
I'd argue $100/hr isn't enough for that work, but sounds about right from what I've seen.
Whereas I've done a java, scala, kafka, spark, postgres job and easily gotten $150/hr, and that work isn't anywhere as technically challenging.
I think my point is business doesn't understand how to value technology experience and they skew towards business value vs difficulty and skill.
- killtimeatwork 5y agoIf they're still getting qualified applicants at $100/hr, then it's all good from this point of view. In general, if jobs paid proportionally to technical difficulty, then theoretical astrophysicists would be making millions a year - while in reality they make much less than someone fresh out of a Javascript bootcamp.