3 ms·
There are already all sorts of demonstrable long term effects of COVID. No speculation necessary. How much time must pass without long term effects materializ
by flyingcircus3 5y ago
There are already all sorts of demonstrable long term effects of COVID. No speculation necessary.
How much time must pass without long term effects materializing before unvaccinated people admit that the vaccinated had a point?
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago> How much time must pass without long term effects materializing before unvaccinated people admit that the vaccinated had a point? Rhetorical question, but: Given what we know about long term effects of vaccination, about 3-4 months without "long term effects". Needless to say, this mark has been passed more than once - in trials in 2020, and then again in mass vaccination programs in 2021.
- mbg721 5y agoPeople are about to be coerced into an injection against their will and could suffer ill effects, with no legal recourse. If it turns out they were right, then they were screaming the truth the whole time and nobody listened. Are you okay with all that?
- flyingcircus3 5y agoPeople are already catching a devastating disease against their will, and are already suffering ill effects. Are you beginning to see how all of your speculation about hypotheticals has real world analogs that are already occuring?
- mbg721 5y agoMany of the people in my speculation about hypotheticals already had COVID. It's not an exclusive-or.
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago> If it turns out that the world _was_ flat, then they were screaming the truth the whole time and nobody listened. Are you okay with all that? If. I mean, yes? It all depends on how plausible the original proposition is. So the proposition under test here is "are COVID vaccines preferable to COVID"? The data from the real world is here and it's not even close.