> These optimizations leave for C++ folks. C doesn't need all of that Yes, it does. In fact C needs it more, because of the "for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)" idiom

> These optimizations leave for C++ folks. C doesn't need all of that Yes, it does. In fact C needs it more, because of the "for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)" idiom. At least idiomatic C++ code uses iterators.