5 ms·

I think the apology is here because the author of the PR doesn't want to revert it. As you can see, it's still merged: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/blob/

by Zababa 5y ago

I think the apology is here because the author of the PR doesn't want to revert it. As you can see, it's still merged: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/blob/b930a34badfb2164f3830f47aaf8aae1568a1578/src/Directory.build.props https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/blob/b930a34badfb2164f38... Edit: as lots of people said, I was on an older version of the file. I'm not sure how I did this, but I should have double-checked, especially since there was some base64 stuff in the URL.

bombcar 5y ago
I can still cut it down to three words: Sorry not sorry.
markphip 5y ago
I did not see any indication that she was asked to revert the PR. It seemed like it was more just about that she felt it was OK to bypass the policy.
- Arnavion 5y ago
  And, regardless of whether this particular PR Is reverted or not, whether there's anything to prevent her or any other board member from doing this again.
  - markphip 5y ago
    It does not seem like she did it as a Board member, she did it because she felt like she was still an Active Maintainer of that project. It seems like the project feels like even if she is still a Maintainer she still was wrong to merge without discussion.
gus_massa 5y ago
It was reverted in https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commit/a502b596d4c4a45a75a613594866d87680991a46#diff-a977439a271df79c88284a87b9c965846c6822775f8e204e9c3c96766696188c https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commit/a502b596d4c4a45a7...
int_19h 5y ago
You're looking at the older version of the file. Here's the complete history: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commits/main/src/Directory.build.props https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commits/main/src/Directo... So it was merged, then reverted almost immediately, and then reimplemented by the project maintainers in the manner they preferred (without a new dependency).
Aaronontheweb 5y ago
That's a small part of a much larger trust issue with the foundation: https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38 https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

by Zababa 5y ago

bombcar 5y ago

I can still cut it down to three words: Sorry not sorry.

markphip 5y ago

I did not see any indication that she was asked to revert the PR. It seemed like it was more just about that she felt it was OK to bypass the policy.

Arnavion 5y ago
And, regardless of whether this particular PR Is reverted or not, whether there's anything to prevent her or any other board member from doing this again.
- markphip 5y ago
  It does not seem like she did it as a Board member, she did it because she felt like she was still an Active Maintainer of that project. It seems like the project feels like even if she is still a Maintainer she still was wrong to merge without discussion.

gus_massa 5y ago

It was reverted in https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commit/a502b596d4c4a45a75a613594866d87680991a46#diff-a977439a271df79c88284a87b9c965846c6822775f8e204e9c3c96766696188c https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commit/a502b596d4c4a45a7...

int_19h 5y ago

You're looking at the older version of the file. Here's the complete history: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commits/main/src/Directory.build.props https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/commits/main/src/Directo... So it was merged, then reverted almost immediately, and then reimplemented by the project maintainers in the manner they preferred (without a new dependency).

Aaronontheweb 5y ago

That's a small part of a much larger trust issue with the foundation: https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38 https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]