2 ms·
Those other outlets didn't put "incel" in the headline though. It would have been one thing if NPR put it in quotes but they didn't - the way it's written, it s
by jimbob45 5y ago
Those other outlets didn't put "incel" in the headline though. It would have been one thing if NPR put it in quotes but they didn't - the way it's written, it sounds like they themselves are identifying the individual as an "incel" which is just as strange as if they were to identify a prostitute in a headline as a "slut". It sounds incredibly biased to use that sort of language and, at the very least, comes off as out-of-place slang.
- smt88 5y agoI get what you're saying, but how is incel different from "hacker" (when Anonymous does something newsworthy) or "neo-Nazi" or "White supremacist" in situations where the subject of the article wants to be known as part of that community? The guy in your article doesn't seem to be ashamed of the word, and its original meaning wasn't pejorative to them. It was a way to find support without shame. Slut was always a negative word that has had to be reclaimed, and there still aren't online slut communities inspiring each other to murder innocent people. (I'm not the one downvoting you btw)