3 ms·
But if the price of that benefit is 30% off the top for Apple for all payments, it's a high price to pay. Perhaps better consumer protection laws would be a bet
by not2b 5y ago
But if the price of that benefit is 30% off the top for Apple for all payments, it's a high price to pay. Perhaps better consumer protection laws would be a better way to fight the dark patterns.
- Arcsech 5y agoAs a consumer, I have effectively no control over laws. I do have control over which payment system I use. So if you as an app developer don't want to give a 30% cut to Apple, maybe push for better consumer protection laws so IAP doesn't have that incredible benefit for me.
- mithr 5y agoYou can believe that dark billing patterns are bad and this change is good, while at the same time also believing Apple should charge developers less -- these are not mutually exclusive.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- rdsnsca 5y agoThe judge in the Epic case did rule Apple was entitled to payment even if it didn't go through their payment system. No ruling was made about if the 30 % was too high or not.