8 ms·
The author who wrote this has tweeted, on average, 1-2x a day for 10 years. https://twitter.com/jaronschneider https://twitter.com/jaronschneider Twitter has b
by ramoz 5y ago
The author who wrote this has tweeted, on average, 1-2x a day for 10 years. https://twitter.com/jaronschneider https://twitter.com/jaronschneider
Twitter has by far become a more egregious platform for society (an information/propagation architecture that exploits how people process information, imo).
For me, Facebook is nothing more than a hometown forum. I havent logged on in months.
- BitwiseFool 5y ago>"Twitter has by far become a more egregious platform for society" Absolutely. Not only are the people on Twitter much more toxic, the trending feed is way more prone to manipulation and influence campaigns. If I don't know someone directly on Facebook, I'm probably never going to see their stupid hot-takes. No such separation on Twitter. Also, whenever I scroll through Facebook, more than half the posts are advertisements anyways. It rarely shows me anything of value from my friends and somehow fixates on the same dozen people. Oddly, I was never even very friendly with those dozen in real life. People say Facebook is dangerous because people fall into a loop of following content they already like and falling into grouptthink. Firstly, how in the world does not apply more strongly with Twitter? Second, on Twitter it is possible to bombard non-followers with repeated, biased, and motivated messaging. I think this is far more insidious because it creates a false sense of consensus and you can condition people to react a certain way with repeated messaging. And, these users don't even need to actively follow the influencers' accounts. Edit: I don't even follow people like "Brooklyn Dad, Defiant!", "Duty to Warn", or "Palmer Report", yet I am always seeing content from these paid influencers whenever I click on a trending topic. So imagine if you're not a partisan person and you consistently keep seeing messages from these kinds of accounts. Chances are, eventually, some of their tweets are going to influence how you think and give you a biased view of things.
- npunt 5y agoI wouldn't take your personal experience on Facebook to be universal. Being a public social network, Twitter's toxicity and distortions are much more visible than Facebook's, and the user experience is far less varied because of common touchpoints like Trending Topics and celebrity posters. Facebook is a far more unique experience per user, so personal experience isn't a great way to understand others experience. A lot of Facebook's problems are related to the network you've formed, on Pages you have to follow, or in private Groups. Facebook also serves far more people and is ubiquitous and worldwide in a way that Twitter just is not. That's why you can't really rely on your own judgment of the product and sort of have to fly on instruments (population level data) to understand it. This is also why it's critical to have researchers have access to that data to understand what is going on.
- BitwiseFool 5y agoI'm never logged in as a user and I don't have an account. So I imagine what I see is likely what other people tend to see if not logged in.
- PragmaticPulp 5y ago> Twitter has by far become a more egregious platform for society I'm always surprised that Reddit gets a free pass in these discussions. Reddit has been home to some of the most egregious bad communities and misinformation hives. Their invisible-hand moderation system allows a small number of moderators to completely control the conversation in a subreddit. Banning dissenters and removing comments that don't agree with what the moderators want people to see is an easy way to make it look like everyone is in natural agreement on a topic. The weirdest part is that most tech people readily admit that Reddit is full of terrible content, even on the front page. The common retort is that it's not so bad if you create an account and manually remove all of those bad subreddits from your list, but by the same argument Facebook isn't a problem because you can simply not subscribe to the bad content.
- spookthesunset 5y ago> Banning dissenters and removing comments that don't agree with what the moderators want people to see is an easy way to make it look like everyone is in natural agreement on a topic. This happens way more than people know, by the way. Some of the moderators on large subreddits are complete dicks to people who go against the grain. Good luck appealing. All you can do is create another account for that subreddit or just never visit it again.
- avgDev 5y agoI hate Reddit mostly for its hive mind. For example: There is a video of someone blasting music and neighbor clearly being upset. The offender calls the lady Karen. Then, all the comments are bashing so called "Karen". Even though many places in the US have laws in place to prevent people from blasting music all day. Stating this brings many down votes. I had an awful neighbor in an area where houses are close apart. He would get wasted, cut grass with a lawnmower and blast music out of his car, which he could not hear because of lawn mower. My windows would shake when I was trying to study.
- ferrumfist 5y agoReddit is an amazing platform for niche hobbies and tech forums. It is fucking terrible for its political news. It's so clearly biased AND it leaks into every default subreddit.
- afavour 5y ago> Twitter has by far become a more egregious platform for society I don't really see how that can be true when only 20% of so of the population actually use Twitter. It's very small beans compared to Facebook, or YouTube for that matter.
- anonfornoreason 5y agoPolicy makers, journalists, and educators tend to use twitter pretty extensively. What happens on twitter affects the worldview of just about every journalist out there. Don't like the current ideological capture of journalism on both sides of the US political spectrum? Blame twitter for a significant portion of that.
- mmarq 5y agoFor me Twitter is a bit more than an RSS feed, I block everybody who ends up in my timeline for no good reason. A while ago I told Twitter I live in Germany, because I was told they have to censor nazis down there. It's way healthier than Facebook, where blocking the crazy friend of your aunt may cause endless real life discussions.
- micromacrofoot 5y agoI feel like everyone ignores scale here. Facebook is an of magnitude larger even before considering Instagram and WhatsApp. They have nearly 3 billion active users. Twitter is a fraction of the scale/influence, especially outside of english speaking countries. WhatsApp is the de facto communication platform in some countries. Facebook is the internet in some parts of Africa. India has nearly as many Facebook users as the US has adults in total. Even if you don't use Facebook yourself, society around you uses it... a lot... and that impacts you.
- aaron695 5y agoThe greatest trick Twitter ever pulled was convincing the world Facebook were the problem. The entire world lives in an altered reality. Always have been. Now you just say Facebook enough times and people believe anything. We deserve what we've got. Facebook even has a simple path to less toxicity and seems to have done it, Twitter has no other state than toxic. The genealogy of toxic Facebook is also traced to Twitter.
- iammisc 5y agoTwitter is certainly more toxic than Facebook!