There's perverse incentives going for both obvious plans (company pays vs town pays), but I suspect one is worse than the other. If we say that towns should pa

There's perverse incentives going for both obvious plans (company pays vs town pays), but I suspect one is worse than the other. If we say that towns should pay the burden, then companies cannot "incentivize" police, but they can also exhibit disproportionate burden vs. other police priorities. If we say that companies pay, then at some point the company is responsible for so much of police wellbeing that the police begin to lose moral credibility.