4 ms·
So in your analysis, how many people should robocars be killing? The easy answer is "anything less than 30K", right? Somehow that case only looks "very strong"
by _jal 5y ago
So in your analysis, how many people should robocars be killing? The easy answer is "anything less than 30K", right?
Somehow that case only looks "very strong" to people with a financial interest in the tech.
- rightbyte 5y agoUnless you are a serial drunk driver you would want FSD to be alot safer then the human average.
- satisfice 5y agoDeath by robocar is simply unacceptable. Death by shared responsibility is well accepted. It’s about agency and consent. If you rescued a group of 30 drowning people with your yacht. No one thinks you can shoot one or two on the head, on a whim, and argue that it’s okay— based on the fact that your actions led to a net saving of 28 lives. So, how you die matters. We human drivers are all out there making a reasonable effort to avoid accidents. The standard self-driving tech must be held to is also “reasonableness.” None of the deaths due to self-driving cars I have heard of can meet that standard. They are unacceptable.