> If we have an attitude where “computer says no” means you’re now subjected to criminal penalties You've made quite a leap here - he's talking about using fac

> If we have an attitude where “computer says no” means you’re now subjected to criminal penalties You've made quite a leap here - he's talking about using facial recognition software to automate the comparison of pictures from a surveillance video against known criminals (something police have been doing, manually, for decades) and you've jumped straight to "an algorithm is judge, jury and executioner".