4 ms·
This one is curious. The website appears to suggest that the list of open issues being presented was generated over 4 months ago. That made me assume it was som
by the_lonely_road 5y ago
This one is curious. The website appears to suggest that the list of open issues being presented was generated over 4 months ago. That made me assume it was someone stumbling upon it and then sticking it on HN, but the github name on the submission and the HN name on here are close enough it is probably the same person.
Shouldn't you regenerate the list at least nightly to be up to date so people are not reading over issues potentially closed months ago?
My second question is what is driving the short list of technologies? You include Typescript and Javascript as seperate entries but no Ruby, Rust or C++ all of which jumped out to me but no doubt there is a much wider list of relevant technologies I am not thinking about as well.
- david_for_you 5y agoGiven that today is 6th Oct, I am gonna guess 06-10-2021 means today, and not the 10th of June. More often than not American dates would use a 06/10/2021 format, I think?
- deathanatos 5y ago> More often than not American dates would use a 06/10/2021 No, we use the nonsense MM/DD/YYYY ordering (usually without leading 0s). 6 Oct would be 10/6/2021. ISO/RFC 3339 YYYY-MM-DD is really the way to go…
- fn1 5y ago> This one is curious. The website appears to suggest that the list of open issues being presented was generated over 4 months ago. It was generated today. 6.10, not 10.6. Fixed it. > My second question is what is driving the short list of technologies? I will add more languages.
- euphoria 5y agoYYYY.MM.DD or YYYY-MM-DD is unambiguous if you would like to improve it.
- voiper1 5y agoISO 8601 - https://xkcd.com/1179/ https://xkcd.com/1179/ Because it's sorted better: https://www.reddit.com/r/ISO8601/comments/lkusca/improved_visualisation_of_the_date_formats_more/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ISO8601/comments/lkusca/improved_vi...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]