3 ms·

Why not?

• 1121redblackgo 5y ago
  It's illegally obtained information, sensitive information, about thousands of individuals and their personal businesses. I don't think its appropriate, and I would hate to be on that list right now.
  • corobo 5y ago
    Isn't this the exact argument search engines have been fighting for years in relation to piracy? The data hasn't been provided, a link to the data has been provided
    • 1121redblackgo 5y ago
      Sure. Morally what do you think is the right thing to do?
      • theknocker 5y ago
        Cover up the leak and pretend it never happened, obviously. Let's make it hard for twitch users to even find out what was leaked about them. That will help.
      • corobo 5y ago
        Morally I wont be using any of the data. The data however is out whether you roadblock access to it or not. The chances of you stopping someone who's nefarious enough to use the data but so non-technical that they can't find a magnet link is so low it wasn't worth me typing this sentence about it
        • 1121redblackgo 5y ago
          It’s not about stopping anyone, and it doesn’t matter what are people are doing. It’s about making a choice about what we want to stand for and then acting on that. And that’s a choice.
          • deleted 5y ago
            [deleted]
          • corobo 5y ago
            You can't keep calling something a choice when people decide on the option you don't want
      • willmorrison 5y ago
        That’s up to the person posting it and there shouldn’t be a rule deciding either way for them.