3 ms·
Again, I'm not sure what you're arguing about. I just said "the UX here is due for a lot of innovation." And you replied "I want to have searchable fulltext in
by danShumway 5y ago
Again, I'm not sure what you're arguing about.
I just said "the UX here is due for a lot of innovation." And you replied "I want to have searchable fulltext in those 900+ tabs." Where is the conflict?
Yes, you could build a really interesting tab/bookmarking system in a browser that blurred the lines between tabs and bookmarks and archival. You could do really interesting things with browser history, you could do really interesting things with all of these features.
That is exactly what I just said, the area is ripe for innovation. Currently, you don't have full-text searchable tabs, the UX isn't optimized for your use case. Would be cool if you did though, that would be a feature that would be fun for browsers to play around with.
- BikeHelmet 5y agoJust FYI, but Opera does search the full page contents of every tab when using the tab search located next to the minimize button. The browser seems to be one of the only ones innovating right now, at least for power users. Edit: Now if only they'd fix their bookmark system!
- brokenmachine 5y agoMaybe I should check Opera out again, I used to use it back in the day and it had innovative features back then. I forget what they called it but you could link one page to another, so I could have an index page open on one monitor and when you clicked on links in that, it would open those links in tabs in a window I had on another monitor.
- brokenmachine 5y agoI wouldn't say I was arguing, just ranting about my desires like most people here. And "again" implies that I've replied to you before, but that was my first reply to your comment. Perhaps you were confusing me with hsbauauvhabzb. I even quoted the part of your comment that I was replying to.