3 ms·
yes, we'd love to offer Timescale as an extension, but still waiting for buy-in from the Timescale team on this. If we can't manage we'll eventually do somethi
by kiwicopple 5y ago
yes, we'd love to offer Timescale as an extension, but still waiting for buy-in from the Timescale team on this.
If we can't manage we'll eventually do something else for timeseries data - eg, we could do a Foreign Data Wrapper to Clickhouse tables
- qoega 5y agoWhy use FDW if you can work with ClickHouse directly? What is the use case? By the way I can see there are some already but I do not use them https://github.com/Infinidat/infi.clickhouse_fdw/ https://github.com/Infinidat/infi.clickhouse_fdw/ https://github.com/adjust/clickhouse_fdw https://github.com/adjust/clickhouse_fdw
- kiwicopple 5y ago> Why use FDW It would be beneficial to couple transactional data (Postgres) with OLAP data (CH). There are a few other things coming in PG which might mitigate the need for CH too (pluggable storage, zheap), so we're not going to rush this part.