4 ms·
We could use both, but only one option is viable with current technology. Existing carbon capture should not be subsidized because it's pointless. Sponsoring r
by y4mi 5y ago
We could use both, but only one option is viable with current technology.
Existing carbon capture should not be subsidized because it's pointless. Sponsoring research into carbon capture would be good, but existing methods don't achieve anything wrt the climate crises.
- realusername 5y agoThat's because carbone capture has a lack of funding, I'd call most of those schemes R&D at best. That's not an indication if it will work or not.