3 ms·
... But at the current pace, we _will_ need active capture, so that we get back down from the suspected 2.5-3° temperature increase. Sure, carbon capture from a
by mattashii 5y ago
... But at the current pace, we _will_ need active capture, so that we get back down from the suspected 2.5-3° temperature increase. Sure, carbon capture from air might not be the most efficient use of energy, but if you're overproducing energy (e.g. solar at a sunny day, and grid is otherwise saturated) then I would very much like to have all that energy go into removing carbon from the air.