3 ms·

I would posit that no company "actually" cares. The premise of twitter isn't "the social platform that has no abuse". If that were the main goal, i'd imagined

I would posit that no company "actually" cares. The premise of twitter isn't "the social platform that has no abuse". If that were the main goal, i'd imagined they'd be another nothing startup that ran out of money and died years ago. So then if only companies that don't have social good as their primary goals are the ones that would ever exist in the first place, then it feels that trying to judge companies for doing so seems not particularly useful.

xg15 5y ago
> So then if only companies that don't have social good as their primary goals are the ones that would ever exist in the first place Or alternatively, we could try to view this as the root problem and try to fix it. Edit: Note there is also a difference between "not having social good as their primary goal" and working effectively against the social good, whether intentional or not. Edit2: Explanation of the downvote would be nice.