4 ms·
It’s cheaper to build single page apps using web developers than to build and maintain multiple platform-specific native apps.
by eloisius 5y ago
It’s cheaper to build single page apps using web developers than to build and maintain multiple platform-specific native apps.
- yunohn 5y agoNot everything needs to be a native application, nor should it be. The vast majority of SaaS and such apps are SPA/equivalent and would NOT benefit from being yet-another-installable app. Could you provide examples (not exceptions) maybe to support your PoV?
- perryizgr8 5y ago> The vast majority of SaaS and such apps are SPA/equivalent and would NOT benefit from being yet-another-installable app. Could you provide few examples of such apps that would not benefit from being native?
- yunohn 5y agoI haven't wished for any/most web-apps that I use to be native. This is also the status quo. As such, people with an opposing viewpoint (like the earlier commenter) should provide a basis for their argument. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
- easygenes 5y agoSo the smaller-scale correlate would be that SPAs can make more sense for proof-of-concept or hobby-developed applications that need some cross-platform access.