>Then there is the case of things are illegal, but are not enforced. Leading to the question of what is the law? What is written, or how it is enforced? Ah, I

>Then there is the case of things are illegal, but are not enforced. Leading to the question of what is the law? What is written, or how it is enforced? Ah, I really appreciate this point. I imagine when it comes to law, I would want the goal to be the alignment of what is written and what is enforced. If law is what is written but not enforced, then it seems to be law-in-name-only, whereas if it's enforced but not written, then it seems to be, I don't know, chaotic? Haha, I can't think of a better term right now. I suppose the latter might depend on how much unwritten agreement there is amongst people on the rules. If a lot of agreement, then maybe it's more like ethics. If not much agreement, maybe it's more unpredictable, almost lawless.