4 ms·
> but it's useful to acknowledge he wasn't exactly a "good guy" What exactly constitutes a "good guy" for you? The only possible definition is somebody who wa
by GDC7 5y ago
> but it's useful to acknowledge he wasn't exactly a "good guy"
What exactly constitutes a "good guy" for you?
The only possible definition is somebody who wastes away his life, doesn't have fun, works all the times and gifts the discoveries of his endless hours of work to his subordinates so that they can claim as their own.
Obviously rejects any compensation above minimum wage for the whole ordeal, so that he could not even have the temptation to spend, because he needs that minimum amount to eat.
Not even Jesus Christ would manage to make it into your tier of "good guys".
What has the world come to...Feynman being thrown under the bus on HN.
- edmundsauto 5y agoTo me, it's someone of character who doesn't treat the other sex like objects or puzzles to be solved. Or, if they do and learn from it, doesn't brag about the exploits in their memoirs. There is also the dad test - would you want them dating your daughter?