> So you get to ignore all the responsibilities that come with your rights so Absolutely not. I know lots of people that manage to drink alcohol responsibly. T

> So you get to ignore all the responsibilities that come with your rights so Absolutely not. I know lots of people that manage to drink alcohol responsibly. They never drink and drive, don't regularly over indulge and it makes their and their peers lives _better_. What negative externality are they paying for with alcohol taxes? > How about you take full responsibility: you get to not put whatever in your body, and you agree never to take an ambulance ride or be treated by a hospital. > Don't want the vaccine? That's fine, it's your right. But now when you can't breathe, nobody coming to help. If I pay for health insurance, I'm already taxing myself in this instance. It would be perfectly reasonable for a health insurance company to offer incentives for people to be vaccinated just like they offer incentives to non-smokers. If the government wants to start providing that healthcare, then they can have a say in the cost of poor health decisions.