5 ms·
The fact that he is not does not invalidate the parent comment and your question sidesteps the fact that he left lasting damage that is still playing out on th
by haswell 5y ago
The fact that he is not does not invalidate the parent comment and your question sidesteps the fact that he left lasting damage that is still playing out on the political stage today.
- endisneigh 5y agoIt literally does. He was democratically removed. The fact he left lasting damage is besides the point, and no system of government can prevent bad actors, only minimize the damage.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dqx 5y agoHe was an oligarch, and then was democratically elected. His supreme court appointees will continue to enforce his policies for the rest of their lives. > no system of government can prevent bad actors Everything's the same! So crypto's no worse then?
- endisneigh 5y ago> His supreme court appointees will continue to enforce his policies for the rest of their lives. that's not how the legislature works. A motivated majority can undo anything via the passing of new legislation via an election of a majority of the house and senate. > Everything's the same! So crypto's no worse then? I already explained in the GP. Give it a read.
- dqx 5y agoAgreed, he was an oligarch, and then was democratically elected, but who's to say what Brett "Devil’s Triangle" Kavanaugh will do in the face of a motivated majority?
- foobar2021 5y agoGet dragged out his chair by the military?
- brighton36 5y agoIt was a show election. The rules were changed mid-game, on the pretense of corona, to rig the outcome.