3 ms·
For everyone responding that smokers cost the government money, it is actually the opposite in that they save the government money because on average they die s
by mrep 5y ago
For everyone responding that smokers cost the government money, it is actually the opposite in that they save the government money because on average they die sooner. From the manning study: "In this analysis, the federal government saves about $29 billion per year in net health and retirement costs (accounting for effects on tax payments). These include a saving in retirement (largely social security benefits) of about $40 billion and in nursing home costs (largely medicaid) of about $8 billion. Costs include about $7 billion for medical care under 65 and about $2 billion for medical care over 65; the remaining $10 billion cost is the loss in contributions to social security and general revenues that fund medicaid. "
(PDF): https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/19980430_97-1053E_53c5970fc27b0ed73363e89535a5a160a7a997cb.pdf https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/19980430_97-1053E_53c59...
- dandotway 5y agoPresumably COVID also saves the government money, then? It mostly kills the old who have already paid into the tax system their whole working lives and are now drawing from it. And it mostly kills the chronically ill who need more tax support than they contribute. It seems terribly cold and callous to look at it this way though, e.g. when a son is holding his mom's hand in the hospital who is dying of lung cancer, to go up to the son and tap his shoulder and whisper, "Hey kid, cheer up, uncle Sam saved $8 bil on medicaid nursing home costs 'cus mommy here couldn't stop sucking nicotine sticks."
- parineum 5y ago> Presumably COVID also saves the government money, then? It most certainly does. The retort your parent made is for those who make the argument that a tax is necessary because X (smoking, in this case) costs the country economically. If you want to make the purely _economic_ argument, it's a benefit to the bottom line.