Are there any specific parts of her testimony that you disagree with? From what I have seen, everything she has said tracks correctly, and does not go outside

Are there any specific parts of her testimony that you disagree with? From what I have seen, everything she has said tracks correctly, and does not go outside her realm of knowledge. She has limited her focus very clearly, for example on FB prioritizing reshares vs a known increased risk of violence. So she is in perfect position say that FB has chosen to prioritize growth over user safety.