5 ms·
So the original claim should have been "nothing is a business model, everything is a crime"?
by teawrecks 5y ago
So the original claim should have been "nothing is a business model, everything is a crime"?
- the_af 5y agoDo you think that's the most charitable interpretation of the original claim?
- teawrecks 5y agoThe original claim wasn't coherent, that's my point.
- flavius29663 5y agohe didn't say "nothing" or "everything", he said "tracking" is a crime. To which you responded "it's not a crime in our laws" to which I said "YET". I am not sure where you drew this conclusion from? I introduced "everything" in the sense that everything "could" become a crime at some point, like mass private surveillance should.