10 ms·
Did someone refer to it as a discovery? In fact, from the introduction in the article. > It is difficult to imagine that this algorithm was not discovered befo
by stagger87 5y ago
Did someone refer to it as a discovery? In fact, from the introduction in the article.
> It is difficult to imagine that this algorithm was not discovered before, but we are unable to find any references to it.
- NoGravitas 5y agoI expect it's "commonly rediscovered because it's so simple; rarely published because it's so obviously bad".