3 ms·
At one point, I think that was one of my in-parallel goals of the Terminal project, but at this point I think it's just become a part of my own mental goals for
by zadjii 5y ago
At one point, I think that was one of my in-parallel goals of the Terminal project, but at this point I think it's just become a part of my own mental goals for the Terminal. There's already so much of the tmux-like stuff that I really liked from tmux, that we may as well just go whole-hog on it at this point :)
- csdvrx 5y ago@zadjii, in case it's not clear enough from my praises on how promising Windows Terminal Preview is, thanks a lot for all the wonderful work you're doing with the Windows Terminal team. At first I was afraid the project would take the easy way out and ignore hard features or take shortcuts (ex: SGR1 : bold or bright? or both? or none?) but you have shown you are willing to do what it takes to properly support applications. This is not just in line with the reputation of Microsoft when it comes to backwards compatibility, but going above and beyond to make sure everything works perfectly. When sixel support is added to WT, it will replace mintty as my favorite terminal -- and I'm very picky when it comes to terminals. WT is a wonderful contribution to the open source world, and I hope it will inspire similar terminals on Linux (or be usable through wine) Oh, and uh, my apologies if you felt my contribution to the sixel thread (PR #448) were out of line. Since your last message, I've realized my posts may be off topic, as a degraded mode is not what most people may want, even as a stopgap measure, so I've stopped posting there.