4 ms·
> I question his impartiality on making statements such as this. There is a very good way to verify the claims: check the data. Dragging in questions regardin
by nuerow 5y ago
> I question his impartiality on making statements such as this.
There is a very good way to verify the claims: check the data.
Dragging in questions regarding antibody test policies, stock portfolios, and potential conflicts of interest just sound like cheap character assassination attempts that have absolutely no relation with the prevalence of long Covid.
- celticninja 5y agoHe doesn't present the data, he asks us to take his word for it, or the article does at least. Therefore to decide whether I can accept his word I need to know about him and his character. From initial research into him there are some queries about his behaviour, raised by an organisation that I do trust, therefore I do not accept his claim without question. Don't accept things blindly because you agree with them (or the converse), "be a good judge of who is a good judge".
- nuerow 5y ago> He doesn't present the data (...) If that's what you're going with then you only need to verify the data to either refute or verify his claim. Everything else is just noise at this point.
- celticninja 5y agoHow do I verify it when I don't have it and he doesn't provide it?
- nuerow 5y ago> How do I verify it when I don't have it and he doesn't provide it? You didn't even bothered to look, did you? https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/prevalenceofongoingsymptomsfollowingcoronaviruscovid19infectionintheuk/1april2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthan...