4 ms·

So your argument is that the no true Scotsman fallacy is not a fallacy because Scotsmen do in fact exist? It would be nice to state in advance that you have ab

So your argument is that the no true Scotsman fallacy is not a fallacy because Scotsmen do in fact exist? It would be nice to state in advance that you have abandoned logic and that any discussion with you is pointless.

SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
It's that claiming everything is a fallacy is a pointless distraction. it's not _always_ a falacy. As I said, "Anything taken to excess is a flaw" - there is always a limit somewhere. That does not in itself make everything "no true scotsman!"