4 ms·
If I'm understanding the outcome of the Epic case that these documents came to light from, that kind of hardball would probably go pretty poorly. While Apple mo
by chipotle_coyote 5y ago
If I'm understanding the outcome of the Epic case that these documents came to light from, that kind of hardball would probably go pretty poorly. While Apple mostly won the case, between this and a case in South Korea, it's pretty clear they're going to be required to allow some kind of linking for external account management of "reader apps," which they classify Netflix as.
Personally, I suspect if Apple had not gone the ridiculously overreaching "we want a cut of every purchase of digital goods/services when the purchase occurs in any app on iOS" route, and had let Netflix and Amazon and anyone doing "reader apps" at least link out from the very beginning (and more reasonably, allow them to -- gasp! -- load a web view to purchase/manage subscriptions, buy ebooks, etc.), it would have saved an awful lot of heartache.
Well, that and just go with a 15% cut across the board rather than 30%.
Well, all of that and also include at least streaming game services in their quirky definition of "reader apps".
- Retric 5y agoAre you sure about game subscriptions? They don’t require Blizzard to use IAP for their MMO related apps. These could do a few in game actions, so there is some flexibility.
- chipotle_coyote 5y agoAre those Blizzard apps on iOS, or on the Mac? As far as I know, on iOS, you have to offer in-app purchases for subscriptions, unless you meet specific criteria -- you may be able to offer subscriptions outside IAP in addition, but you need to let people buy in the app. (On the Mac, though, none of this really applies.)
- Retric 5y agoiOS, though it’s a long way from actually playing the game.