No- it's about whether a 4% reduction (or 40%, or whatever marginal rate) in transmission is cause for termination, when we know that "compliant” employees, in

No- it's about whether a 4% reduction (or 40%, or whatever marginal rate) in transmission is cause for termination, when we know that "compliant” employees, in a near 100% vaccinated population will still transmit the virus. More so if the argument is that the hospital patient population is especially vulnerable. We don't even know if the likelihood of transmission is reduced enough to affect over number of transmissions.