3 ms·
How is mandating a remote employee, who's clearly not moving around a legitimate interstate interest. Pray do tell. In general, non-kangaroo courts require laws
by iammisc 5y ago
How is mandating a remote employee, who's clearly not moving around a legitimate interstate interest. Pray do tell. In general, non-kangaroo courts require laws to be written to be suitably tailored and narrow in scope.
- throwaway0a5e 5y ago>How is mandating a remote employee, who's clearly not moving around a legitimate interstate interest Do I get to use the same asinine reasoning they used in Wickard v. Filburn? Because if not then your guess is as good as mine.