2 ms·
For what it's worth, all of the systems that Apple has shipped with the M1 are replacing systems which also did not have replaceable components and could not ma
by danudey 5y ago
For what it's worth, all of the systems that Apple has shipped with the M1 are replacing systems which also did not have replaceable components and could not manage incremental updates.
The main difference that I see is that the M1 chip is much faster and more power efficient than the systems it replaced (as well as much more expensive systems, for that matter; see M1 Air vs. Macbook Pro). I suspect that means that people who buy the M1 systems that Apple is selling won't replace their laptops as soon as people who bought x86 versions.
Your point is taken, but this is a trend that Apple has been moving towards regardless; it's not something that's new to the M1 Macs. You haven't ever been able to swap out your motherboard or processor in a Macintosh with very few exceptions (including the Xeon Mac Pros), and we've yet to see what an M1 (or M2 or whatever) Mac Pro would look like, expandability-wise, anyway.
- posguy 5y agoIts almost like Apple stuck with a CPU vendor that was trapped at 14nm while they were able to buy access to TSMC 5nm, a full 3 generations ahead of what was in older Macs, with each generation providing significant double digit improvements in density and power usage reduction.
- fomine3 5y agoTheir last MacBook Air uses Ice Lake so it's jump from Intel 10nm, so about 1.5-2 generation jump?
- nebula8804 5y agoAh yes, I forgot to mention in my original comment that I also have a Core i9 Macbook Pro and it seems more slow than the M1 mac. I cannot even believe it but I love to use the ~700$ Mac Mini and the $2800 laptop stays in the bag.
- arvinsim 5y agoThe moment I bought the M1 MBA 3 months ago is when I knew I fucked up purchasing the i9 MBP last 2020 mid year.