I don't disagree necessarily, but humans seems capable of solving problems even when when they are poorly defined by understanding the some implicit context. Su

I don't disagree necessarily, but humans seems capable of solving problems even when when they are poorly defined by understanding the some implicit context. Sure if we encode all the context, the computer can solve it too, but isn't that fundamentally what the article is trying to convey? That we haven't really taught computers to read between the lines yet?