2 ms·
It is archive.org's mission, but archiving is a case where you'd want to have more than one... right? :)
by aristus 18y ago
It is archive.org's mission, but archiving is a case where you'd want to have more than one... right? :)
- sh1mmer 18y agoI get that but I'm not sure I see the author's point though. Replicating Archive.org isn't hard, it's pretty standard web spider stuff, it's just massively resource intensive. You can try and distribute that but I suspect it would just end up like most Bit Torrent trackers where the head of the long tail has lots of support and the tail has little to no support.