> To use that logic, we should also not have judges or a legal system. I don't see how that conclusion is drawn at all. The legal system is run by highly trai

> To use that logic, we should also not have judges or a legal system. I don't see how that conclusion is drawn at all. The legal system is run by highly trained individuals in as public a way as possible, bounded by its own set of standard laws and procedures, to very specific sets of issues, often times throwing out cases because they are not "resolvable" by the narrow capabilities of the system. To compare a random anonymous person behind closed doors spitting out a "fact check" on their laptop to judges is an insult to judges and the legal system.