3 ms·
I think this is part of the job of Archive.org I would also say that particularly on blogs it shouldn't be too hard to capture revisions of major blogs. Most b
by sh1mmer 18y ago
I think this is part of the job of Archive.org
I would also say that particularly on blogs it shouldn't be too hard to capture revisions of major blogs. Most blogs 'ping' out Technorati, etc in order to get updated into the search index. It would be easy to capture a revision with each ping.
- aristus 18y agoIt is archive.org's mission, but archiving is a case where you'd want to have more than one... right? :)
- sh1mmer 18y agoI get that but I'm not sure I see the author's point though. Replicating Archive.org isn't hard, it's pretty standard web spider stuff, it's just massively resource intensive. You can try and distribute that but I suspect it would just end up like most Bit Torrent trackers where the head of the long tail has lots of support and the tail has little to no support.