I see this kind of comparisons all the time, where the test subject associated with the author is strictly better than the rest (especially the tables). I think

I see this kind of comparisons all the time, where the test subject associated with the author is strictly better than the rest (especially the tables). I think this discredits the product rather than helping it, as you are either too arrogant to acknowledge any merits from your competitors, or you cherry picked the criteria. But surely the marketers know better than me, so what's going on?