I mean... You can look at the paper, they actually do use a novel generative AI model, so it's rather strange to criticize this being labeled AI. And, the pape

I mean... You can look at the paper, they actually do use a novel generative AI model, so it's rather strange to criticize this being labeled AI. And, the paper also shows the new model to outperform existing ones in 84% of cases according to a bunch of human forecasters, so calling this just PR is overly cynical IMO. As far as "It’s not doing true weather prediction but rather extrapolating the movement of radar images.", both the paper and article say the paper is tackling short term rain prediction ('precipitation nowcasting'), so it's not oversold as far as I can see.