> So, it's not that the economy is incomprehensible but it's structure changes and so it's structure can't be captured by pure economic theory. Pure economic t

> So, it's not that the economy is incomprehensible but it's structure changes and so it's structure can't be captured by pure economic theory. Pure economic theory is an oxymoron, other fields dealing with human behavior figured this out a long time ago, while economics desperately clung to the idea that it was actually math, rather than a social science. (Otherwise I agree with you)