I think it's safe to spread that distribution as if it were throughout new England and the Midwest. Those states have just reported/recorded the information mor

I think it's safe to spread that distribution as if it were throughout new England and the Midwest. Those states have just reported/recorded the information more. As someone who recently purchased a home in one of those states, I was glad to actually have at least some detailed information available about nearby superfund sites and testing results. If you turn off drinking water, the distribution looks more even. It just seems to be bias in the water testing/reporting.