The ideas that Nilay puts forth as good examples of patents are held up here to be bad examples. Why is that? Because Nilay doesn't understand why these paten

The ideas that Nilay puts forth as good examples of patents are held up here to be bad examples. Why is that? Because Nilay doesn't understand why these patents are obvious. Which is the whole fucking problem with the patent system Nilay: People like you saying "Well, these patents look reasonable to me, so why are you people who do this for a living complaining?"