3 ms·
Is this another one of those GDPR articles that has no teeth? I cannot imagine how Google can keep running it’s spam filters, Facebook it’s automated bans, and
by tomp 5y ago
Is this another one of those GDPR articles that has no teeth? I cannot imagine how Google can keep running it’s spam filters, Facebook it’s automated bans, and Twitter its algorithmic feed, while abiding by this.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- londons_explore 5y agoPresumably it means a spammer can send a spam email, and then when it goes into the spam folder, has the right to ask google to review that decision. Sounds fair enough, especially if the spammer either has to pay the costs of the review (ie. a few dollars), or is limited to being only allowed one review per month/year to prevent abuse.