4 ms·
I can't find the article online (it does say it's "upcoming") but here's the press release[1] in the journal. An interesting comment from the authors: "Christe
by losvedir 15y ago
I can't find the article online (it does say it's "upcoming") but here's the press release[1] in the journal. An interesting comment from the authors:
"Christenfeld and Leavitt conclude the paper by saying that perhaps some of our “other intuitions about suspense may be similarly wrong.”
“Perhaps,” they write, “birthday presents are better when wrapped in cellophane, and engagement rings are better when not concealed in chocolate mousse.”
We might be also well-advised to reconsider surprise parties, Christenfeld said.
But I don't know. Maybe they aren't spoilers, per se, but I know some of my favorite books and movies have me going "Oh! How is this going to end?" or "Oh! How are they going to get out of that!" I'd love to know how much was actually spoiled. Was it, as in the ars article does, "Dumbledore dies on page 596", or like a cliff's notes version of the whole story.
[1] http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/spoiler-alert-stories-are-not-spoiled-byspoilers.html http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/...
- ugh 15y agoI think the authors go a bit too far with their suspicions (but they use appropriate language, so that’s alright). I would like to see their experiment repeated with, for example video games like Portal (where I do suspect that spoilers matter) or movies. I think their results are very intriguing, but it’s still very possible that the truth is a bit more complicated. It’s time to explore the landscape of spoilers. (Isn’t that what everyone writes at the end of their papers? “Further research, however, is necessary.“)