3 ms·
> 40x performance drop that is stated could be actually nothing. It isn't though. The performance difference between Windows Terminal and refterm is dramatic e
by mwcampbell 5y ago
> 40x performance drop that is stated could be actually nothing.
It isn't though. The performance difference between Windows Terminal and refterm is dramatic enough that he could demonstrate it in a video.
- galkk 5y agoAnd that is why I'm saying that initial bug report could be done better. For example, out of curiosity I did the test from the last message: doing "cat big.txt" in WSL2. In Windows terminal it took 1.5s, but in Kitty terminal, that is running under wslg (same ubuntu version), it takes 0.34s. Powershell, from the other side, is awful (20-25s).
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]