I would be interested in the portion of Shawn Henry's testimony that you are referring to. Because Cloudstrike still maintains their response to the DNC hack ob

I would be interested in the portion of Shawn Henry's testimony that you are referring to. Because Cloudstrike still maintains their response to the DNC hack observed a Russian presence in examining their servers, and Henry's response to Congress on the topic was: "We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence." Attacks that coincide with patterns seen from Russian intelligence is evidence. Evidence isn't proof. If you're standard of evidence is "A Russia n defector with server logs and video recordings of FSB officials confirming the acts".... Well, then you're using the word "evidence" wrong.