Maybe it's just me, but... When you're writing anything non-trivial, you ought to have something new and/or interesting to say, otherwise you're just adding no

Maybe it's just me, but... When you're writing anything non-trivial, you ought to have something new and/or interesting to say, otherwise you're just adding noise to the environment. I can see this being useful in finding ways to rephrase things, improving the structure or flow of a document. But this seems to be suggesting content rather than form or format. Adding content to your writing because it commonly appears in writing similar to yours seems to go against the idea of new and interesting. That may be good for politicians, but I can see this being misused to 'bulk-up' a small number of ideas or facts into a full paper. On balance, this could easily do far more harm than good.