4 ms·
I agree -- as a "former mathematician", I find economics to be much more daunting than math, and I'm skeptical about anyone who has more than a modicum of certa
by mahogany 5y ago
I agree -- as a "former mathematician", I find economics to be much more daunting than math, and I'm skeptical about anyone who has more than a modicum of certainty about it. Modern mathematics is certainly complex, but there are definitive axioms that are nearly universally agreed-upon, and proofs operate on logic alone. It's like a hard game with known rules. Are there definitive axioms in economics that apply to the real world with irrational actors?
As you say, I think the key component that introduces all the uncertainty is: humans. You can't prove anything interesting about a human-based system using pure logic (at least not that I'm aware of).
I'm reminded of the quote by Von Neumann: "If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is."
But I will be the first to admit that my economics understanding is shallow. I'm curious: what are examples of theorems or definitive truths in economics that we know apply to the real world with real humans?
- paulpauper 5y ago>But I will be the first to admit that my economics understanding is shallow. I'm curious: what are examples of theorems or definitive truths in economics that we know apply to the real world with real humans? Supply/demand, IS-LM model, risk-neutral pricing, no arbitrage conditions. In the latter, 'free lunches' tend to be arbitrag-ed away by market participants (humans).
- satellite2 5y agoEven tough those are very robust models, they can still end up being wrong given some policy (some asset distributed via first come first served or via a lottery to avoid price increase for instance). The only real definition I see is the equation of exchange which is purely mathematical and not linked to any real world data, but there are probably many other that are definitions and not theories / models.